FedRAMP 20x Readiness for Small Government Software
We don't sell authorizations. We build the audit-ready evidence layer that makes a small public-sector system defensible — and FedRAMP 20x preparation tractable.
FedRAMP is the federal program for authorizing cloud systems to handle government data. Historically it meant a slow, document-heavy process most small vendors could never justify. The newer FedRAMP 20x direction changes the shape of the work: it favors automated validation, machine-readable security evidence, and continuously maintained data over static binders assembled once and left to age.
That shift rewards a discipline we already practice. The same controls a serious compliance program needs — role-based access, complete audit logging, encryption, backups, a defensible record of every change — are the controls FedRAMP asks you to evidence. We help small government-software vendors and agencies get their systems into that posture: not a certificate on the wall, but the access, audit, and evidence foundation that authorization is built on.
What This Is — and Isn't
We are engineers, not a Third Party Assessment Organization (3PAO). We do not issue authorizations, grant an ATO, or list systems on the FedRAMP Marketplace — only authorized bodies do that. "FedRAMP-aligned" and "FedRAMP 20x-ready" are not the same as "FedRAMP Authorized." What we do is build and document systems so that the access controls, audit trails, and security evidence an assessor expects already exist and are current — so that when a 3PAO, an agency sponsor, or an auditor asks, the answer is a record, not a scramble.
What We Build — the Evidence Layer
A working system that produces its own evidence as it runs, kept current in human- and machine-readable form — the artifacts a readiness review actually asks for.
- ✓ A security decision log — choices recorded over time, with the reasoning behind each
- ✓ Access-control evidence — who has which role, and why, exportable on demand
- ✓ A vulnerability and remediation log — what was found, when, and how it was closed
- ✓ An incident-response record — detection, action, and follow-up, written to be read later
- ✓ A data-boundary diagram — what the system holds, where it runs, what it connects to
- ✓ Change-management and audit export — every change traceable, in open formats
- ✓ A control-to-feature mapping — each control answered by a real part of the system
- ✓ Backup and restore proof — recovery demonstrated, not just configured
Control-to-Feature Mapping
FedRAMP draws its controls from NIST SP 800-53. The point of readiness is that each control family is answered by something real in the system, not a paragraph promising it. Here is how the controls we build toward map to working features — and to the evidence each one produces.
| Control Family | What It Asks For | In a System We Build |
|---|---|---|
| Access Control (AC) | Least-privilege access, scoped by role | Role-based access control for staff, reviewers, and administrators; an exportable record of who holds what |
| Identification & Authentication (IA) | Verified identity before access | Single sign-on (SAML, OAuth 2.0), MFA, and integration with Entra ID, Active Directory, and LDAP |
| Audit & Accountability (AU) | A reliable record of who did what, and when | Complete, append-only audit logging written so a non-technical reviewer can read a case end to end |
| System & Communications Protection (SC) | Data protected in transit and at rest, within a defined boundary | Encryption in transit and at rest, US-based data residency options, and a documented system boundary |
| Contingency Planning (CP) | The system can be recovered after failure | Automated backups, point-in-time recovery, and a disaster-recovery plan with restore demonstrated |
| Configuration Management (CM) | Changes are controlled and traceable | Versioned, documented deployments and a change record tied to every release |
| Risk Assessment (RA) | Weaknesses are found and tracked to closure | Vulnerability scanning with a remediation log — finding, severity, fix, and date in one place |
| Incident Response (IR) | Incidents are detected, handled, and recorded | An incident-response record covering detection, action taken, and follow-up |
| System & Information Integrity (SI) | Inputs are validated and the system is monitored | Input validation and injection prevention, plus continuous uptime monitoring and alerting |
Control families are illustrative, not the full NIST 800-53 baseline. A real readiness package documents the applicable controls in full, with the system's actual boundary and inherited controls. Detailed control narratives and mappings are prepared per engagement.
Why FedRAMP 20x Changes the Math
The traditional process priced small vendors out: a one-time package, assembled by consultants, that started aging the day it was filed. FedRAMP 20x moves toward evidence that is maintained continuously and available in both human- and machine-readable form — through trust centers, documentation portals, downloadable files, and APIs — as long as it stays current and understandable.
That favors systems that generate their evidence as a byproduct of running correctly, rather than producing it once for an audit. It is a better fit for a small, disciplined system than for a sprawling one — which is exactly the kind of system we build.
Why Us
This isn't a new product line. It's the same foundation we already run for public-sector compliance programs — role-based access, approval workflows, complete audit logging, and a defensible record of every action — documented against the controls that matter for federal work. We run a live compliance platform managing 10,000+ regulated assets for a public utility, so the evidence layer is something we operate, not just describe. Principal-led, built on proven cloud infrastructure, with no vendor lock-in and full data portability in open formats like CSV and JSON through documented APIs.
What We Don't Do
- We don't issue authorizations or grant an ATO — that's the government's role.
- We aren't a 3PAO and don't perform the formal assessment.
- We don't claim a system is "FedRAMP Authorized" or "FedRAMP Ready" — those are designations only the program confers.
We build and document the system so the controls are real, the evidence is current, and the readiness work that comes next has a foundation to stand on instead of a gap to paper over.
Building government software and want it audit-ready before the question comes?
Start a Conversation